Clark v. Bingham & Bingham
259 Mich. 697
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 16, 1932
DocketDocket No. 121, Calendar No. 36,563
StatusPublished
This text of 259 Mich. 697 (Clark v. Bingham & Bingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clark v. Bingham & Bingham, 259 Mich. 697 (Mich. 1932).
Opinion
Plaintiffs had decree for rescission of a land contract on the ground of fraud, in representing that the lot had a sand bathing beach. We agree with the circuit judge in his finding that the representations were material, made, relied upon, and false.
Decree affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
259 Mich. 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-bingham-bingham-mich-1932.