Clark v. Belden

New York Supreme Court

Clark v. Belden

19 Johns. 174

DecidedAugust 15, 1821

StatusPublished

This text of 19 Johns. 174 (Clark v. Belden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. Belden, 19 Johns. 174 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1821).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The service of the notice of trial had no effect, nor was the defendant bound to take notice of it, until he had received notice of the change of venue ; and when that was, in fact, given to the agent of the defendant’s attorney, there were not twenty-eight days before the Oneida circuit. The motion is granted.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The service of the notice of trial had no effect, nor was the defendant bound to take notice of it, until he had received notice of the change of venue ; and when that was, in fact, given to the agent of the defendant’s attorney, there were not twenty-eight days before the Oneida circuit. The motion is granted.

Motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Johns. 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-belden-nysupct-1821.