Clark v. Beasley

Fourth Circuit

Clark v. Beasley

118 F. App'x 739

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 3, 2005·No. No. 04-1936·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Evelyn B. Clark appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Clark v. Beasley, No. CA-03-1074-3 (E.D.Va. July 8, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Evelyn B. Clark appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Clark v. Beasley, No. CA-03-1074-3 (E.D.Va. July 8, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Clark v. Beasley, 118 F. App'x 739 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

118 F. App'x 739 (Clark v. Beasley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related