Clark v. Beard

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Clark v. Beard

951 A.2d 261, 597 Pa. 228, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 977

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 23, 2008

DocketPetition 204 EM 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 951 A.2d 261 (Clark v. Beard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. Beard, 951 A.2d 261, 597 Pa. 228, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 977 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

*229 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of June, 2008, the Petition for Habeas Relief is DENIED, without prejudice, the Petition for a remand is also DENIED. Petitioner’s Request for Permission to Respond to Respondent’s Brief in Opposition and Application to File said Nunc Pro tunc is DENIED.

The Prothonotary is directed to refer the Petitions to The Federal Community Defender Office, Mr. Ñolas, and Mr. Harris, as counsel for Petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*229 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of June, 2008, the Petition for Habeas Relief is DENIED, without prejudice, the Petition for a remand is also DENIED. Petitioner’s Request for Permission to Respond to Respondent’s Brief in Opposition and Application to File said Nunc Pro tunc is DENIED.

The Prothonotary is directed to refer the Petitions to The Federal Community Defender Office, Mr. Ñolas, and Mr. Harris, as counsel for Petitioner.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

951 A.2d 261, 597 Pa. 228, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-beard-pa-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack