Clark v. Beard

951 A.2d 261, 597 Pa. 228, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 977
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 23, 2008·No. Petition 204 EM 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*229 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of June, 2008, the Petition for Habeas Relief is DENIED, without prejudice, the Petition for a remand is also DENIED. Petitioner’s Request for Permission to Respond to Respondent’s Brief in Opposition and Application to File said Nunc Pro tunc is DENIED.

The Prothonotary is directed to refer the Petitions to The Federal Community Defender Office, Mr. Ñolas, and Mr. Harris, as counsel for Petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. Beard, 951 A.2d 261, 597 Pa. 228, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 977 (Pa. 2008).

951 A.2d 261 (Clark v. Beard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anderson v. Court of Common Pleas
951 A.2d 261 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2008)