Clark v. Ames

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Clark v. Ames

251 A.D. 791, 298 N.Y.S. 167, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7547

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 19, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D. 791 (Clark v. Ames) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. Ames, 251 A.D. 791, 298 N.Y.S. 167, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7547 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and the facts as matter of discretion and matter remitted to the County Court for a rehearing, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: In review of the inconsistency of the findings as to whether there was or was not a fair and reasonable market value at the date of the foreclosure sale, we have determined to order a rehearing. All concur. (The order denies motion for entry of a deficiency judgment in a mortgage foreclosure action.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law and the facts as matter of discretion and matter remitted to the County Court for a rehearing, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: In review of the inconsistency of the findings as to whether there was or was not a fair and reasonable market value at the date of the foreclosure sale, we have determined to order a rehearing. All concur. (The order denies motion for entry of a deficiency judgment in a mortgage foreclosure action.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D. 791, 298 N.Y.S. 167, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-ames-nyappdiv-1937.