CLARK v. ALIGHT SOLUTIONS, LLC

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ____________________________________

BRUCE L. CLARK, : Plaintiff, : : v. : No. 5:21-cv-01855 : ALIGHT SOLUTIONS, LLC, and : EXELON CORPORATION : Defendants. : ____________________________________

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 11th day of March, 2022, upon consideration of Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, ECF No. 44, Plaintiff’s response, ECF No. 46, and for the reasons given in the accompanying Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants’ motion to dismiss, ECF No. 44, is granted. 2. Plaintiff’s amended complaint, ECF No. 40, is dismissed with prejudice.1 3. This case is closed.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr.__________ JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Judge

1 The Court dismisses Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint with prejudice because he had an opportunity to cure his claim’s deficiencies but did not. Any additional amendments would therefore be futile. See Boyd v. New Jersey Dept. of Corrections, 583 Fed. Appx. 30, 32 (3d Cir. 2014). 1