Clark v. Alabama

Supreme Court

Clark v. Alabama

311 U.S. 688, 61 S. Ct. 70

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 28, 1940

DocketNo. 345; No. 392

StatusPublished

This text of 311 U.S. 688 (Clark v. Alabama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. Alabama, 311 U.S. 688, 61 S. Ct. 70 (1940).

Pincite

Opinion

[688]*688On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama; and

[689]*689No. 392. October 28, 1940. Mr. George W. Chamlee for petitioner in No. 345. Lee Montgomery, pro se. Messrs. Thomas S. Lawson, Attorney. General of Alabama, and William H. Loeb, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent in No. 345.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh District.

The motions for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis are denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds that the applications for writs of certiorari were not filed within the time provided by- law. Section 8 (a), Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 940). The petitions for writs of certiorari are therefore also denied.

Reported below: No. 345, 239 Ala. 380; 195 So. 260.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI