Clark v. Airco of St. Lucie, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Clark v. Airco of St. Lucie, Inc.

195 So. 2d 203

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedFebruary 15, 1967

DocketNo. 35667

StatusPublished

This text of 195 So. 2d 203 (Clark v. Airco of St. Lucie, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. Airco of St. Lucie, Inc., 195 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 27, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore déniéd.

The petition for attorney’s fees is also denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and .ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI