Clark v. Adams

Superior Court of New York

Clark v. Adams

3 N.Y.S. 819, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 960

CourtThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

DecidedMay 7, 1888

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.Y.S. 819 (Clark v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. Adams, 3 N.Y.S. 819, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 960 (superctny 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The reason assigned by the trial judge for refusing to dismiss the complaint was erroneous, but the ruling was correct. The action, was for an accounting, and the record shows that the counter-claim, to which, the plaintiff made no reply, was allowed to the defendants in the computation-of the amount for which the plaintiff had judgment. As to the merits, the-opinion delivered by the learned judge at special term is correct. The record discloses no error, and upon the whole case it appears that substantial justice-has been done. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The reason assigned by the trial judge for refusing to dismiss the complaint was erroneous, but the ruling was correct. The action, was for an accounting, and the record shows that the counter-claim, to which, the plaintiff made no reply, was allowed to the defendants in the computation-of the amount for which the plaintiff had judgment. As to the merits, the-opinion delivered by the learned judge at special term is correct. The record discloses no error, and upon the whole case it appears that substantial justice-has been done. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.Y.S. 819, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-adams-superctny-1888.