Clark v. ACF Industries, Inc.

716 S.W.2d 863, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 4657
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 9, 1986·No. No. 51246·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

KELLY, Judge.

Appellant, Philip J. Clark, was an employee of ACF Industries and was working under the provisions of the Missouri Work[864]*864ers’ Compensation Law. On January 2, 1979, appellant sustained injury during the course of his employment.

Following a hearing and an award by an Administrative Law Judge, appellant filed an application for re-hearing based upon change of condition. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ordered a remand and re-hearing. The hearing was subsequently held, and the transcript was forwarded to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. The Commission has never ruled on the re-hearing.

This claim arose on January 3,1979. We only have jurisdiction to hear appeals from a “final award” of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission after said award has been appealed to the Circuit Court where the claim arose prior to August 13, 1980. Section 287.490.2 RSMo 1978.1

Appellant urges us to compel the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission to act upon appellant’s Motion for Change of Condition. Section 287.490.2 RSMo 1978 provides only for appeal of a “final award,” and inaction by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is not a “final award” for purposes of appeal. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal as premature.

CRANDALL, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. ACF Industries, Inc., 716 S.W.2d 863, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 4657 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986).

716 S.W.2d 863 (Clark v. ACF Industries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Banks v. Mack
814 S.W.2d 686 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1991)