Clark v. Abrams

161 A.D.2d 1208

This text of 161 A.D.2d 1208 (Clark v. Abrams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. Abrams, 161 A.D.2d 1208 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The court was without authority to grant the petition, annul the determination of respondent Commissioner, and order her to enroll petitioner in the Drinking Driver Program. A person is prohibited from participating in the program if, during the five years immediately preceding his commission of an alcohol-related traffic offense, he participated in the alcohol rehabilitation program (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1196 [4]). The record establishes that petitioner was in the program from November 16, 1983 to May 7, 1984 and that on October 27, 1988 petitioner was convicted of driving while intoxicated on August 31, 1988. Thus, since petitioner had participated in the program within five years immediately preceding his second alcohol-related offense, he was prohibited from participating in the program. Neither the Commissioner nor the court may disregard the statutory eligibility requirement. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Patlow, J.—art 78.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1196
New York VAT § 1196

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 A.D.2d 1208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-abrams-nyappdiv-1990.