Clark & Thaw v. Wilder

25 Pa. 314
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 1, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 25 Pa. 314 (Clark & Thaw v. Wilder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark & Thaw v. Wilder, 25 Pa. 314 (Pa. 1855).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Black, J.

The only exception on which we are expected to reverse this judgment is, that the Court below should have given judgment for defendants instead of the plaintiffs on the point reserved. When we look at the record we find no point reserved. The verdict was given subject to the opinion of the Court on the [316]*316whole case, whether the plaintiffs were entitled to recover. It is impossible for the human imagination to conceive of anything more unlike a point.

But this judgment was according to the verdict, and we affirm it, because, after an attentive consideration of the evidence, we find nothing in it on which a point could have been reserved that would have entitled the defendants to a judgment non obstante veredicto.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nuside Metal Products, Inc. v. Eazor Express, Inc.
189 Pa. Super. 593 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1959)
Casey v. Pennsylvania Asphalt Paving Co.
47 A. 1128 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1901)
Wolf v. Jacobs
10 Pa. Super. 54 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)
Fisher v. Scharadin
40 A. 1091 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1898)
Yerkes v. Richards
32 A. 1089 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Pa. 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-thaw-v-wilder-pa-1855.