CLARK SECCHIARI, etc. v. HARVEY RUVIN, etc.
This text of CLARK SECCHIARI, etc. v. HARVEY RUVIN, etc. (CLARK SECCHIARI, etc. v. HARVEY RUVIN, etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed October 13, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-0198 Lower Tribunal No. 20-1078 ________________
Clark Secchiari, etc., Appellant,
vs.
Harvey Ruvin, etc., Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Reemberto Diaz, Judge.
Zebersky Payne Shaw Lewenz LLP, and Zachary D. Ludens and Edward H. Zebersky (Fort Lauderdale); Law Offices of Randy Maultasch, and Randy S. Maultasch, for appellant.
Holland & Knight LLP, and Christopher Bellows and Cory W. Eichhorn and Philip E. Rothschild (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.
Before SCALES, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Zoba v. City of Coral Springs, 189 So. 3d 888, 891-92 (Fla.
4th DCA 2016) (performing a functional analysis of the clerk’s acts under a
separate statutory scheme and determining that “[t]he clerk’s act of
collection, apportionment, and disbursement is part of that judicial
process—it is a judicial act entitling the clerk to [quasi-judicial] immunity”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
CLARK SECCHIARI, etc. v. HARVEY RUVIN, etc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-secchiari-etc-v-harvey-ruvin-etc-fladistctapp-2021.