CLARK SECCHIARI, etc. v. HARVEY RUVIN, etc.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed October 13, 2021.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D21-0198
Lower Tribunal No. 20-1078
Clark Secchiari, etc.,
Appellant,
vs.
Harvey Ruvin, etc.,
Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Reemberto Diaz, Judge.
Zebersky Payne Shaw Lewenz LLP, and Zachary D. Ludens and Edward H. Zebersky (Fort Lauderdale); Law Offices of Randy Maultasch, and Randy S. Maultasch, for appellant.
Holland & Knight LLP, and Christopher Bellows and Cory W.
Eichhorn and Philip E. Rothschild (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.
Before SCALES, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Zoba v. City of Coral Springs, 189 So. 3d 888, 891-92 (Fla.
4th DCA 2016) (performing a functional analysis of the clerk’s acts under a separate statutory scheme and determining that “[t]he clerk’s act of collection, apportionment, and disbursement is part of that judicial process—it is a judicial act entitling the clerk to [quasi-judicial] immunity”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
CLARK SECCHIARI, etc. v. HARVEY RUVIN, etc. (CLARK SECCHIARI, etc. v. HARVEY RUVIN, etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.