Clark Paper & Manufacturing Co. v. Stenacher

183 A.D. 915
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1918·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We are of the opinion that an injunction restraining the defendant from soliciting orders for the George Irish Paper Company, from such customers as plaintiff sold paper to while defendant was in its employ and restraining him from communicating to the George Irish Paper Company, or any other competitor of the plaintiff in the State of New York, the methods or processes of plaintiff’s business or the names of its customers, is all the protection the plaintiff is entitled to by temporary injunction. All concurred. Injunction order modified in accordance with per curiam memorandum, without costs on this appeal to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark Paper & Manufacturing Co. v. Stenacher, 183 A.D. 915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).

183 A.D. 915 (Clark Paper & Manufacturing Co. v. Stenacher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eastman Kodak Co. v. Warren
108 Misc. 680 (New York Supreme Court, 1919)