Clark & Nunnally v. Gumming & Co.
This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 355 (Clark & Nunnally v. Gumming & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A broker is a special agent, and derives his power and authority to bind his principal from the instructions given to him by the latter. When definite instructions are given by the principal to the broker to sell goods for him at a specified price for a certain time and day only, this will not authorize the broker to contract and sell the same kind of goods for his principal at a different and subsequent time for the same price. His power is limited by and ceases with his instructions ; and this is true, even though it had been usual, in the course of dealings between the broker and his principal, for the broker to continue to sell at the prices last quoted by the principal. Code, §§2194, 2196, 2184; Story Ag., p. 32; -1 Esp., Ill, 113 ; 32 Md., 169, 179, 180; 60 111., 237. '
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Ga. L. Rep. 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-nunnally-v-gumming-co-ga-1886.