Clark Marine Corporation v. Cargill, Inc.

Fifth Circuit

Clark Marine Corporation v. Cargill, Inc.

345 F.2d 79, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5655, 1966 Trade Cas. (CCH) 71,674

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 7, 1965

Docket21729_1

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 345 F.2d 79 (Clark Marine Corporation v. Cargill, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark Marine Corporation v. Cargill, Inc., 345 F.2d 79, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5655, 1966 Trade Cas. (CCH) 71,674 (5th Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The facts from which this appeal arose and the basis for the district court’s decision are fully developed in its opinion. Clark Marine Corporation v. Cargill, Inc., 226 F.Supp. 103. After notice of appeal was filed, the deposition of a witness was taken. A motion to quash the deposition was denied with a reservation referring to the panel hearing the case on the merits the question as to what effect, if any, should be given to the deposition. We conclude that the deposition should not be considered, but we are also of the opinion that a consideration of it would not in any way affect the disposition of the appeal. We find ourselves in agreement with the district court and its judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The facts from which this appeal arose and the basis for the district court’s decision are fully developed in its opinion. Clark Marine Corporation v. Cargill, Inc., 226 F.Supp. 103. After notice of appeal was filed, the deposition of a witness was taken. A motion to quash the deposition was denied with a reservation referring to the panel hearing the case on the merits the question as to what effect, if any, should be given to the deposition. We conclude that the deposition should not be considered, but we are also of the opinion that a consideration of it would not in any way affect the disposition of the appeal. We find ourselves in agreement with the district court and its judgment is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

345 F.2d 79, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5655, 1966 Trade Cas. (CCH) 71,674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-marine-corporation-v-cargill-inc-ca5-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack