Clark Marine Corporation v. Cargill, Inc.

345 F.2d 79, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5655, 1966 Trade Cas. (CCH) 71,674
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 7, 1965·No. 21729_1·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The facts from which this appeal arose and the basis for the district court’s decision are fully developed in its opinion. Clark Marine Corporation v. Cargill, Inc., 226 F.Supp. 103. After notice of appeal was filed, the deposition of a witness was taken. A motion to quash the deposition was denied with a reservation referring to the panel hearing the case on the merits the question as to what effect, if any, should be given to the deposition. We conclude that the deposition should not be considered, but we are also of the opinion that a consideration of it would not in any way affect the disposition of the appeal. We find ourselves in agreement with the district court and its judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark Marine Corporation v. Cargill, Inc., 345 F.2d 79, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5655, 1966 Trade Cas. (CCH) 71,674 (5th Cir. 1965).

345 F.2d 79 (Clark Marine Corporation v. Cargill, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Standard Oil Co. v. Department of Energy
596 F.2d 1029 (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals, 1978)
Telex Corp. v. International Business MacHines Corp.
367 F. Supp. 258 (N.D. Oklahoma, 1973)
I. Haas Trucking Corp. v. New York Fruit Auction Corp.
364 F. Supp. 868 (S.D. New York, 1973)