Clark Lee Hill v. Lawrence G. Myers Jackson County Circuit Court

Eighth Circuit

Clark Lee Hill v. Lawrence G. Myers Jackson County Circuit Court

16 F.3d 1227, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 8315, 1994 WL 24091

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 31, 1994

Docket93-2461

StatusPublished

This text of 16 F.3d 1227 (Clark Lee Hill v. Lawrence G. Myers Jackson County Circuit Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark Lee Hill v. Lawrence G. Myers Jackson County Circuit Court, 16 F.3d 1227, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 8315, 1994 WL 24091 (8th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

16 F.3d 1227
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Clark Lee HILL, Appellant,
v.
Lawrence G. MYERS; Jackson County Circuit Court, Appellees.

No. 93-2461.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: January 26, 1994.
Filed: January 31, 1994.

Before McMILLIAN, MAGILL, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Clark Lee Hill appeals the district court's1 entry of final judgment in favor of defendants2 in his Title VII action. We affirm.

Hill, a youth worker with the Jackson County Circuit Court Juvenile Division, was involved in an off-duty altercation with his girlfriend, a secretarial employee of the juvenile division. As a result, Lawrence Myers, administrator of the juvenile division, discharged Hill. Hill filed a Title VII complaint alleging that his sex was a determining factor in the decision to discharge him, and that Myers had discharged him in retaliation for earlier complaints. After a bench trial, the district court entered judgment in favor of Myers.

On appeal, Hill challenges the district court's assessment of the evidence, but he failed to provide a trial transcript. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b). We find that any meaningful review of the trial court's factual findings is precluded. See Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners, 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1071 (1988).

Accordingly, we affirm.

1

The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, Senior United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri

2

Hill named the Jackson County Circuit Court as a defendant, but he does not challenge on appeal the district court's dismissal of the counts relating to the Circuit Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

16 F.3d 1227
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Clark Lee HILL, Appellant,
v.
Lawrence G. MYERS; Jackson County Circuit Court, Appellees.

No. 93-2461.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: January 26, 1994.
Filed: January 31, 1994.

Before McMILLIAN, MAGILL, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Clark Lee Hill appeals the district court's1 entry of final judgment in favor of defendants2 in his Title VII action. We affirm.

Hill, a youth worker with the Jackson County Circuit Court Juvenile Division, was involved in an off-duty altercation with his girlfriend, a secretarial employee of the juvenile division. As a result, Lawrence Myers, administrator of the juvenile division, discharged Hill. Hill filed a Title VII complaint alleging that his sex was a determining factor in the decision to discharge him, and that Myers had discharged him in retaliation for earlier complaints. After a bench trial, the district court entered judgment in favor of Myers.

On appeal, Hill challenges the district court's assessment of the evidence, but he failed to provide a trial transcript. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b). We find that any meaningful review of the trial court's factual findings is precluded. See Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners, 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1071 (1988).

Accordingly, we affirm.

1

The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, Senior United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri

2

Hill named the Jackson County Circuit Court as a defendant, but he does not challenge on appeal the district court's dismissal of the counts relating to the Circuit Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 F.3d 1227, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 8315, 1994 WL 24091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-lee-hill-v-lawrence-g-myers-jackson-county-c-ca8-1994.