Clark Ken Hussman v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 6, 2010
Docket03-09-00531-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Clark Ken Hussman v. State (Clark Ken Hussman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark Ken Hussman v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN



NO. 03-09-00531-CR
Clark Ken Hussman, Appellant


v.



The State of Texas, Appellee



FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR2008-529, HONORABLE DIB WALDROP, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM



On March 16, 2010, appellant's appointed counsel filed a frivolous appeal brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). On April 8, 2010, appellant filed a pro se "motion to reject appointed counsel." The pro se motion is overruled. The district clerk is directed to make a copy of the appellate record available to appellant if she has not already done so. The district clerk shall confirm her compliance with this order in writing. Appellant's pro se brief or other written response to counsel's brief will be due thirty days after he receives a copy of the record.

It is ordered May 6, 2010.



Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Clark Ken Hussman v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-ken-hussman-v-state-texapp-2010.