Clark ex rel. Clark v. Van De Walle
This text of 332 So. 2d 360 (Clark ex rel. Clark v. Van De Walle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this negligence case, the trial court granted a summary judgment for appellees/defendants. We reverse.
A summary judgment should be cautiously granted in negligence cases and the burden is on the moving party to conclusively demonstrate that there are no genuine issues of material fact. Holt v. Talcott, Fla.1966, 191 So.2d 40. All reasonable inferences must be resolved against the movant. Booth v. Mary Carter Paint Co., Fla.App.2d 1966, 182 So.2d 292. Upon review of the record, considering the evidence in the light most favorable to appellants, we find that appellees failed to prove the absence of genuine issues as to any material fact Accordingly, the judgment for appellees is reversed and this cause is remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
332 So. 2d 360, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-ex-rel-clark-v-van-de-walle-fladistctapp-1976.