Clark ex rel. Clark v. Van De Walle

332 So. 2d 360, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15136
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 21, 1976·No. No. 75-1503·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this negligence case, the trial court granted a summary judgment for appellees/defendants. We reverse.

A summary judgment should be cautiously granted in negligence cases and the burden is on the moving party to conclusively demonstrate that there are no genuine issues of material fact. Holt v. Talcott, Fla.1966, 191 So.2d 40. All reasonable inferences must be resolved against the movant. Booth v. Mary Carter Paint Co., Fla.App.2d 1966, 182 So.2d 292. Upon review of the record, considering the evidence in the light most favorable to appellants, we find that appellees failed to prove the absence of genuine issues as to any material fact Accordingly, the judgment for appellees is reversed and this cause is remanded for further proceedings.

McNULTY, C. J., and GRIMES and SCHEB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark ex rel. Clark v. Van De Walle, 332 So. 2d 360, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15136 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

332 So. 2d 360 (Clark ex rel. Clark v. Van De Walle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gulf Power Co. v. Cox Cable Corp.
570 So. 2d 379 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Dettloff v. Abraham Chevrolet, Inc.
534 So. 2d 745 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Burland v. Hasam Realty
344 So. 2d 880 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)