Clark Equipment Credit Corp. v. Bill Davis Contractor, Inc.
508 So. 2d 703, 1987 Ala. LEXIS 4340
Opinion
The appellant seeks a new trial on the grounds (1) that the trial court erred in one of its jury charges, which, appellant contends, was prejudicial to its case, and (2) that the jury’s verdict was contrary to the great weight of the evidence. We find no justification for granting a new trial; thus, we affirm the judgment, based upon our holding in First Alabama Bank v. Parsons, 426 So.2d 416 (Ala.1982) (on application for rehearing). See Terrell v. John Deere Co., 491 So.2d 918 (Ala.1986).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clark Equipment Credit Corp. v. Bill Davis Contractor, Inc., 508 So. 2d 703, 1987 Ala. LEXIS 4340 (Ala. 1987).
508 So. 2d 703 (Clark Equipment Credit Corp. v. Bill Davis Contractor, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
First Alabama Bank of Montgomery v. Parsons
426 So. 2d 416 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1983)
Terrell v. John Deere Co.
491 So. 2d 918 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1986)