Clark, Delridge Jermaine
This text of Clark, Delridge Jermaine (Clark, Delridge Jermaine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-76,356-02
EX PARTE DELRIDGE JERMAINE CLARK, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 2014CR1658-W1 IN THE 175TH DISTRICT COURT FROM BEXAR COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of two counts of Assault on a Public Servant and sentenced to
twenty years’ imprisonment on each count, to run concurrently. The Fourth Court of Appeals
affirmed his conviction. Clark v. State, No. 04-15-00526-CR (Tex. App.—San Antonio, Nov. 2,
2016) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus
in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM .
PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that he was deprived of an opportunity to file a petition for discretionary
review (PDR) due to the ineffective assistance of his appellate counsel. The trial court recommended
that Applicant be granted an opportunity to file an out-of-time PDR. The court’s recommendation 2
is not supported by the record because it faults appellate counsel regardless of whether Applicant
timely retained her. Accordingly, the trial court shall make additional fact findings. It appears that
Applicant is represented by counsel. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine if
Applicant is represented by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is
indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent
Applicant at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make further findings and conclusions as to when appellate counsel was
retained and whether that retainment was timely for purposes of filing a PDR. The trial court may
make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: September 29, 2021 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Clark, Delridge Jermaine, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-delridge-jermaine-texcrimapp-2021.