Clark, D. v. Stover, J.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 28, 2020·No. 494 MAL 2019 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

DAVID CLARK, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS : No. 494 MAL 2019 ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF : MONICA CLARK, DECEASED, :

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal Petitioner : from the Order of the Superior Court : :

v. :

: :

JEFFREY STOVER, ET. AL. D/B/A : STOVER MCGLAUGHLIN D/B/A STOVER, : MCGLAUGHLIN, GERACE, WEYANDT & : MCCORMICK, P.C., :

:

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of January, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

If an attorney ongoing [sic] represents a client post-occurrence of legal malpractice, should that continuing representation otherwise toll the statute of limitations?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark, D. v. Stover, J., (Pa. 2020).

Clark, D. v. Stover, J. (Clark, D. v. Stover, J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.