Clark, D. v. Stover, J.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
DAVID CLARK, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS : No. 494 MAL 2019 ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF : MONICA CLARK, DECEASED, :
: Petition for Allowance of Appeal Petitioner : from the Order of the Superior Court : :
v. :
: :
JEFFREY STOVER, ET. AL. D/B/A : STOVER MCGLAUGHLIN D/B/A STOVER, : MCGLAUGHLIN, GERACE, WEYANDT & : MCCORMICK, P.C., :
:
Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 28th day of January, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
If an attorney ongoing [sic] represents a client post-occurrence of legal malpractice, should that continuing representation otherwise toll the statute of limitations?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clark, D. v. Stover, J. (Clark, D. v. Stover, J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.