Clark Cty. School Dist. Vs. Ureno
This text of Clark Cty. School Dist. Vs. Ureno (Clark Cty. School Dist. Vs. Ureno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; No. 78749 AND RONNIE GUERZON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY,
vs. Appellants, FILED GABRIEL URENO; GERAD DAVIS; AND BIJO'N PERRY, SEP 1 8 2019 BROWN Respondents. E COU
DEPUTY CtERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
After the settlement judge reported that the parties had agreed to a settlement, this court entered an order directing appellants to file a stipulation or motion to dismiss this appeal or otherwise inform this court of the status of this appeal within 60 days. To date, appellants has not responded to our order or otherwise. communicated with this court. Accordingly, cause appearing, we dismiss this appeal as abandoned. It is so ORDERED.
, J. Hardesty
,J J. Stiglich Silver
cc: Hon. James Crockett, District Judge Ara H. Shirinian, Settlement Judge Clark County School District Office of The General Counsel Ganz & Hauf/Las Vegas Arin & Associates, PC Eighth District Court Clerk 49. f 9 2.00
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Clark Cty. School Dist. Vs. Ureno, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-cty-school-dist-vs-ureno-nev-2019.