Clark Cty. School Dist. Vs. Ureno

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided September 18, 2019·No. 78749·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; No. 78749 AND RONNIE GUERZON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY,

vs.

Appellants,

FILED

GABRIEL URENO; GERAD DAVIS; AND BIJO'N PERRY, SEP 1 8 2019

BROWN

Respondents. E COU

DEPUTY CtERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

After the settlement judge reported that the parties had agreed to a settlement, this court entered an order directing appellants to file a stipulation or motion to dismiss this appeal or otherwise inform this court of the status of this appeal within 60 days. To date, appellants has not responded to our order or otherwise. communicated with this court. Accordingly, cause appearing, we dismiss this appeal as abandoned.

It is so ORDERED.

, J.

Hardesty

,J J.

Stiglich Silver

cc: Hon. James Crockett, District Judge Ara H. Shirinian, Settlement Judge Clark County School District Office of The General Counsel Ganz & Hauf/Las Vegas Arin & Associates, PC Eighth District Court Clerk 49. f 9 2.00

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark Cty. School Dist. Vs. Ureno, (Neb. 2019).

Clark Cty. School Dist. Vs. Ureno (Clark Cty. School Dist. Vs. Ureno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.