Clark Constraction Group, Inc. v. Talmac, Inc.

964 So. 2d 783, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14244, 2007 WL 2609385
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 12, 2007
DocketNo. 3D06-1250
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 964 So. 2d 783 (Clark Constraction Group, Inc. v. Talmac, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark Constraction Group, Inc. v. Talmac, Inc., 964 So. 2d 783, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14244, 2007 WL 2609385 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment entered in favor of Talmac, Inc., following a bench trial. We find no error of law and conclude that there was competent substantial evidence to support the judgment. See Pearce & Pearce, Inc. v. Kroh Bros. Dev. Co., 474 So.2d 369 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). It is not our function to re-weigh the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses and substitute our judgment for that of the trial court. G & G Fashion Design, Inc. v. Garcia, 870 So.2d 870, 873 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prince v. State
964 So. 2d 783 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
964 So. 2d 783, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14244, 2007 WL 2609385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-constraction-group-inc-v-talmac-inc-fladistctapp-2007.