Clark Constraction Group, Inc. v. Talmac, Inc.
964 So. 2d 783, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14244, 2007 WL 2609385
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 12, 2007·No. No. 3D06-1250·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
This is an appeal from a final judgment entered in favor of Talmac, Inc., following a bench trial. We find no error of law and conclude that there was competent substantial evidence to support the judgment. See Pearce & Pearce, Inc. v. Kroh Bros. Dev. Co., 474 So.2d 369 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). It is not our function to re-weigh the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses and substitute our judgment for that of the trial court. G & G Fashion Design, Inc. v. Garcia, 870 So.2d 870, 873 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clark Constraction Group, Inc. v. Talmac, Inc., 964 So. 2d 783, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14244, 2007 WL 2609385 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
964 So. 2d 783 (Clark Constraction Group, Inc. v. Talmac, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Prince v. State
964 So. 2d 783 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)