Clark, Cleaven AKA Clark, Cleaven Telleson

• Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
• Decided: February 3, 2016
• Docket: WR-84,371-01
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-84,371-01

EX PARTE CLEAVEN CLARK, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1182752-A IN THE 248TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to possession of a

controlled substance, and was sentenced pursuant to Section 12.44(a) of the Texas Penal Code to six

months in state jail. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary and that his conviction violates due process

because several years after he entered his plea, the evidence in his case was tested and found not to

contain any controlled substance or dangerous drug. Although Applicant has discharged his sentence in this case, he alleges that he is suffering continuing consequences as a result of this conviction.

Those continuing consequences are sufficient to allow this Court to address his claims. Ex parte

Harrington, 310 S.W.3d 452, 456-57 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010).

The parties have entered agreed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and the trial court

has determined that Applicant’s decision to plead guilty in this case was not a voluntary and

intelligent choice. Applicant is entitled to relief. Ex parte Mable, 443 S.W.3d 129 (Tex. Crim. App.

2014).

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 1182752 in the 248th District Court of Harris

County is set aside.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: February 3, 2016 Do not publish