Clark

Court of Claims

Clark

201 Ct. Cl. 894, 1973 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 62, 1973 WL 4994

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedMay 18, 1973

DocketNo. 179-72

StatusPublished

This text of 201 Ct. Cl. 894 (Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark, 201 Ct. Cl. 894, 1973 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 62, 1973 WL 4994 (cc 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Plaintiffs who are or were quality assurance specialists, Grade GS-1910-11, at the Defense Personnel Support Center, Defense Supply Agency, seek to have their positions reclassified as GS-1910-12 from and after June 1,1970, and they also seek a monetary recovery measured by the differences between what their salaries would have been at GS-12 and the salaries they actually received. This case came before the court on defendant’s and plaintiff’s motions for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof, together with the opposition thereto, the briefs [895]*895of the parties and oral argument of counsel, the court concluded that plaintiffs have failed to show a violation of any applicable statute or regulation or any abuse of discretion by the Civil Service Commission and that they are thus not entitled to recover. On May 18,1973, by order, the court denied plaintiff’s motion, granted defendant’s motion and dismissed the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiffs who are or were quality assurance specialists, Grade GS-1910-11, at the Defense Personnel Support Center, Defense Supply Agency, seek to have their positions reclassified as GS-1910-12 from and after June 1,1970, and they also seek a monetary recovery measured by the differences between what their salaries would have been at GS-12 and the salaries they actually received. This case came before the court on defendant’s and plaintiff’s motions for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof, together with the opposition thereto, the briefs [895]*895of the parties and oral argument of counsel, the court concluded that plaintiffs have failed to show a violation of any applicable statute or regulation or any abuse of discretion by the Civil Service Commission and that they are thus not entitled to recover. On May 18,1973, by order, the court denied plaintiff’s motion, granted defendant’s motion and dismissed the petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 Ct. Cl. 894, 1973 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 62, 1973 WL 4994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-cc-1973.