Clarissa Roman Acosta v. City of Corinth

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)·Decided July 2, 2026·No. 02-26-00329-CV·Published

Opinion

In the

Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

No. 02-26-00329-CV

CLARISSA ROMAN ACOSTA, Appellant V.

CITY OF CORINTH, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV-2024-00382

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Clarissa Roman Acosta attempts to appeal the trial court’s April 21, 2025 order of dismissal. We conclude that we lack jurisdiction and dismiss the appeal.

Generally, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after a judgment is signed. Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. But the filing of certain postjudgment motions, including a timely motion to reinstate, will extend the deadline to ninety days after the judgment is signed. See Tex. R. App. 26.1(a). Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 165a(3) requires that a motion to reinstate “be filed with the clerk within 30 days after the order of dismissal is signed.” Tex. R. Civ. P. 165a(3); see McConnell v. May, 800 S.W.2d 194, 194 (Tex. 1990).

Here, Acosta filed her reinstatement motion on May 23, 2025, beyond her 30-day deadline. “[T]he time limits in Rule 165a are mandatory and jurisdictional.” Cummings v. Billman, 634 S.W.3d 163, 168 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2021, no pet.) (quoting Walker v. Harrison, 597 S.W.2d 913, 915 (Tex. 1980) (orig. proceeding)). Acosta’s notice of appeal was thus due by May 21, 2025. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Because she did not file the notice until May 20, 2026, her appeal is untimely.

We called this issue to Acosta’s attention, and we gave her ten days to show grounds for continuing her appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. Over a month has passed, and Acosta has not responded.1

1 Appellee City of Corinth filed a response and urged dismissal based on Acosta’s untimely notice of appeal.

Because Acosta’s notice of appeal was untimely, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 2, 25.1(b), 26.1; Jones v. City of Houston, 976 S.W.2d 676, 677 (Tex. 1998); Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). We thus dismiss it for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

/s/ Elizabeth Kerr

Elizabeth Kerr

Justice

Delivered: July 2, 2026

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clarissa Roman Acosta v. City of Corinth, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Clarissa Roman Acosta v. City of Corinth (Clarissa Roman Acosta v. City of Corinth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Verburgt v. Dorner
959 S.W.2d 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)
McConnell v. May
800 S.W.2d 194 (Texas Supreme Court, 1991)
Walker v. Harrison
597 S.W.2d 913 (Texas Supreme Court, 1980)
Jones v. City of Houston
976 S.W.2d 676 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)