Clarissa Gilmore v. Georgia Department of Corrections

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clarissa Gilmore v. Georgia Department of Corrections. Read the opinion of the Court — 111 F.4th 1118
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 20, 2026·No. 23-10343·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

In the

United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

No. 23-10343

CLARISSA GILMORE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, an agency of the State of Georgia, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, in his official capacity, ALBERTA W. MILTON, individually and in her official capacity, SABRINI CARLENE LUPO, individually and in her official capacity, SMITH SP WARDEN, in his official capacity as successor-in-interest,

2 Opinion of the Court 23-10343

et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

DOUGLAS M. WILLIAMS, individually and in his official capacity,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 6:18-cv-00115-RSB-CLR

Before ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

This matter returns to us on remand after the en banc Court’s opinion reversing the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Officer Alberta W. Milton and Officer Christina Irizarry on qualified immunity grounds. Gilmore v. Ga. Dep’t of Corr., 144 F.4th 1246, 1264 (11th Cir. 2025) (en banc). Based on the en banc Court’s ruling, we remand the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the en banc opinion.

REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clarissa Gilmore v. Georgia Department of Corrections, (11th Cir. 2026).

Clarissa Gilmore v. Georgia Department of Corrections (Clarissa Gilmore v. Georgia Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.