Clarissa Gilmore v. Georgia Department of Corrections

Eleventh Circuit

Clarissa Gilmore v. Georgia Department of Corrections

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedApril 20, 2026

Docket23-10343

StatusPublished

This text of Clarissa Gilmore v. Georgia Department of Corrections (Clarissa Gilmore v. Georgia Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clarissa Gilmore v. Georgia Department of Corrections, (11th Cir. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 23-10343 Document: 104-1 Date Filed: 04/20/2026 Page: 1 of 2

FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-10343 ____________________

CLARISSA GILMORE, Plaintiﬀ-Appellant, versus GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, an agency of the State of Georgia, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, in his oﬃcial capacity, ALBERTA W. MILTON, individually and in her oﬃcial capacity, SABRINI CARLENE LUPO, individually and in her oﬃcial capacity, SMITH SP WARDEN, in his oﬃcial capacity as successor-in-interest, USCA11 Case: 23-10343 Document: 104-1 Date Filed: 04/20/2026 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 23-10343

et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

DOUGLAS M. WILLIAMS, individually and in his oﬃcial capacity,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 6:18-cv-00115-RSB-CLR ____________________

Before ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This matter returns to us on remand after the en banc Court’s opinion reversing the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Oﬃcer Alberta W. Milton and Oﬃcer Christina Iri- zarry on qualiﬁed immunity grounds. Gilmore v. Ga. Dep’t of Corr., 144 F.4th 1246, 1264 (11th Cir. 2025) (en banc). Based on the en banc Court’s ruling, we remand the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the en banc opinion. REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

USCA11 Case: 23-10343 Document: 104-1 Date Filed: 04/20/2026 Page: 1 of 2

FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-10343 ____________________

CLARISSA GILMORE, Plaintiﬀ-Appellant, versus GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, an agency of the State of Georgia, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, in his oﬃcial capacity, ALBERTA W. MILTON, individually and in her oﬃcial capacity, SABRINI CARLENE LUPO, individually and in her oﬃcial capacity, SMITH SP WARDEN, in his oﬃcial capacity as successor-in-interest, USCA11 Case: 23-10343 Document: 104-1 Date Filed: 04/20/2026 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 23-10343

et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

DOUGLAS M. WILLIAMS, individually and in his oﬃcial capacity,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 6:18-cv-00115-RSB-CLR ____________________

Before ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This matter returns to us on remand after the en banc Court’s opinion reversing the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Oﬃcer Alberta W. Milton and Oﬃcer Christina Iri- zarry on qualiﬁed immunity grounds. Gilmore v. Ga. Dep’t of Corr., 144 F.4th 1246, 1264 (11th Cir. 2025) (en banc). Based on the en banc Court’s ruling, we remand the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the en banc opinion. REMANDED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Clarissa Gilmore v. Georgia Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarissa-gilmore-v-georgia-department-of-corrections-ca11-2026.