Clarion Borough Petition

118 A. 765, 275 Pa. 175, 1922 Pa. LEXIS 473
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 20, 1922·No. Appeal, No. 17·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from the Superior Court, allowed because a constitutional question was alleged to be involved; but the record shows no such point presented to that tribunal. Neither the statement of questions involved, the assignments of error in, nor the opinion of, the Superior Court mentions, or indicates, a constitutional point. Under such circumstances appellants have no standing to be heard in this court: Chartiers Creek Bridge, 235 Pa. 365.

The appeal is dismissed at the cost of appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clarion Borough Petition, 118 A. 765, 275 Pa. 175, 1922 Pa. LEXIS 473 (Pa. 1922).

118 A. 765 (Clarion Borough Petition) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Piper
328 A.2d 845 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1974)
United States Ex Rel. Parker v. Myers
233 F. Supp. 563 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1964)
United States ex rel. Berkery v. Rundle
226 F. Supp. 579 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1964)
Commonwealth v. Cauffiel
148 A. 311 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Consolidated Cigar Corp. v. Corbin
132 A. 364 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)