Claringbold v. Council of Newark

94 A. 1102, 28 Del. 507, 5 Boyce 507, 1915 Del. LEXIS 39
Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided June 15, 1915·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Conrad, J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

The opinion delivered by the Chief Justice in the court below, and the conclusions reached by the Court and reported in — Boyce —, 90 Atl. 1130, represent the views and opinions of the judges in this court; and we are fully satisfied that “the assessor and ‘The Council of Newark’ in assessing and valuing the real estate of the defendant below, plaintiff in error, had the right to take into consideration the fact that the defendant below was at the time the holder of a license to sell intoxicating liquors, as a liquor merchant, at the store house located on and constituting a part of the real estate of the defendant below.”

We find no error in the proceedings of the court below and therefore affirm the judgment therein rendered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claringbold v. Council of Newark, 94 A. 1102, 28 Del. 507, 5 Boyce 507, 1915 Del. LEXIS 39 (Del. 1915).

94 A. 1102 (Claringbold v. Council of Newark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Delaware Racing Association v. McMahon
340 A.2d 837 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1975)
Fitzsimmons v. McCorkle
214 A.2d 334 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1965)
Brennan v. Black
104 A.2d 777 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1954)