Claridy v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Claridy v. United States

474 F. App'x 300

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 26, 2012·No. No. 12-6644·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Claridy appeals the district court’s order dismissing as moot his motion for the return of property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Claridy v. United States, No. 1:11-cv-01620-RDB (D.Md. Mar. 28, 2012). We further grant Claridy’s motion to file exhibits to his informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Claridy appeals the district court’s order dismissing as moot his motion for the return of property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Claridy v. United States, No. 1:11-cv-01620-RDB (D.Md. Mar. 28, 2012). We further grant Claridy’s motion to file exhibits to his informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Claridy v. United States, 474 F. App'x 300 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

474 F. App'x 300 (Claridy v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.