Clarence White v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 30, 2015
Docket49A02-1504-CR-222
StatusPublished

This text of Clarence White v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (Clarence White v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clarence White v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.), (Ind. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be Nov 30 2015, 8:24 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Darren Bedwell Gregory F. Zoeller Marion County Public Defender Attorney General of Indiana Indianapolis, Indiana James B. Martin Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Clarence White, November 30, 2015 Appellant-Defendant, Court of Appeals Case No. 49A02-1504-CR-222 v. Appeal from the Marion Superior Court State of Indiana, The Honorable Amy M. Jones, Appellee-Plaintiff Judge Trial Court Cause No. 49F08-1402-CM-8265

Baker, Judge.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A02-1504-CR-222 | November 30, 2015 Page 1 of 3 [1] On February 19, 2014, Clarence White crashed his red Honda Civic into the

fence surrounding a dumpster on the premises of Riverwood Apartments. The

maintenance man, Terrence Burnett, approached the scene. White got out,

pointed a gun at Burnett, and said, “you didn’t see this.” Appellant’s App. 16.

White got back in the car and drove off, later striking a vehicle from behind.

[2] That day, the State charged White with class A misdemeanor pointing a

firearm,1 class B misdemeanor failure to stop after an accident causing damage

to property,2 and class B misdemeanor failure to stop after an accident causing

damage to an unattended vehicle.3

[3] On March 16, 2015, White and the State agreed to a plea agreement: White

pled guilty to the class A misdemeanor pointing a firearm and was sentenced to

365 days with 357 days suspended. Pursuant to the agreement, the State

dismissed the other two counts and White agreed to pay restitution to

Riverwood Apartments in an amount to be later determined.

[4] The trial court held the restitution hearing on March 25, 2015. At the hearing,

the State presented evidence of the cost of damages to the Riverwood

Apartments. At the hearing, White objected to the invoice provided by

Riverwood Apartments. He then directed the trial court: “the consideration is

1 Ind. Code § 35-47-4-3(b). 2 Ind. Code § 9-26-1-1.1(b). 3 Id.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A02-1504-CR-222 | November 30, 2015 Page 2 of 3 the defendant’s ability to pay.” Tr. 17. The trial court responded: “This is not

something that is going to be paid next week, all right? What I’m looking at is a

good-faith effort towards paying this. . . .” Id. at 19. The trial court ordered

White to pay $675 in restitution to Riverwood Apartments.

[5] White has a single argument on appeal. He requests that we reverse his

restitution order because the victim of the crime to which he pled guilty was

Burnett, not Riverwood Apartments. Moreover, he argues that there is no

evidence that the crime to which he pled guilty, pointing a firearm, caused the

damage to the fence around the dumpster.

[6] Assuming for the sake of argument that White’s legal claim is correct, and that

he did not waive it (since he never raised it before the trial court), his argument

still fails. A “plea agreement is contractual in nature, binding the defendant,

the state, and the trial court.” Pannarale v. State, 638 N.E.2d 1247, 1248 (Ind.

1994). Further, “a defendant may not enter a plea agreement calling for an

illegal sentence, benefit from that sentence, and then later complain that it was

an illegal sentence.” Collins v. State, 509 N.E.2d 827, 833 (Ind. 1987). White is

seeking to retain the benefit of his deal while shirking what he exchanged for it.

He agreed to pay restitution, and must now do so.

[7] The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Bailey, J., and Mathias, J., concur.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A02-1504-CR-222 | November 30, 2015 Page 3 of 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Collins v. State
509 N.E.2d 827 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1987)
Pannarale v. State
638 N.E.2d 1247 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Clarence White v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarence-white-v-state-of-indiana-mem-dec-indctapp-2015.