Clarence Wesley Haley v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 16, 2009
Docket06-09-00047-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Clarence Wesley Haley v. State (Clarence Wesley Haley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clarence Wesley Haley v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-09-00047-CR ______________________________

CLARENCE WESLEY HALEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Sixth Judicial District Court Lamar County, Texas Trial Court No. 22883

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss MEMORANDUM OPINION

A Lamar County jury found Clarence Wesley Haley guilty of failing to register as a sex

offender. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. ANN . art. 62.102 (Vernon 2006).1 The trial court sentenced

Haley, as an habitual offender, to forty-five years' imprisonment. See TEX . PENAL CODE

ANN . §§ 12.32(c)(1), 12.42(c) (Vernon Supp. 2008).

In a companion appeal, cause number 06-09-00046-CR, also before this Court, Haley appeals

his second conviction for failing to register as a sex offender. In that case, Haley was also sentenced

to forty-five years' imprisonment. The sentences are to run concurrently. In cause number 06-09-

00046-CR, Haley raises one additional issue—that the indictment was fundamentally defective.

Because the issues raised in each appeal are otherwise identical, for the reasons stated in our

opinion dated this day in Haley v. State, cause number 06-09-00046-CR, we reform the judgment

of the trial court to reflect the degree of offense to be a third-degree felony.

1 The statute on the judgment listed Section 62.10 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure as the statute for the offense. This statute was redesignated as Article 62.102 effective September 1, 2005.

2 We affirm the judgment, as reformed.

Josh R. Morriss, III Chief Justice

Date Submitted: October 8, 2009 Date Decided: October 16, 2009

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Clarence Wesley Haley v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarence-wesley-haley-v-state-texapp-2009.