Clarence Vincent v. Royal Globe Insurance Company, Mrs. Hilda Mae Smith Honore, Individually, Et Cetera v. McDonnell & Miller, Inc., Great American Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant. No. 30807 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

440 F.2d 793
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 26, 1971
Docket793
StatusPublished

This text of 440 F.2d 793 (Clarence Vincent v. Royal Globe Insurance Company, Mrs. Hilda Mae Smith Honore, Individually, Et Cetera v. McDonnell & Miller, Inc., Great American Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant. No. 30807 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clarence Vincent v. Royal Globe Insurance Company, Mrs. Hilda Mae Smith Honore, Individually, Et Cetera v. McDonnell & Miller, Inc., Great American Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant. No. 30807 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I, 440 F.2d 793 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

440 F.2d 793

Clarence VINCENT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ROYAL GLOBE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Mrs. Hilda Mae Smith HONORE, Individually, et cetera, et
al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
McDONNELL & MILLER, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees,
Great American Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant.
No. 30807 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5th Cir.; Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970,
431 F.2d 409, Part I.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 26, 1971.

Arthur Cobb, Baton Rouge, La., for Mrs. Hilda Mae Smith Honore, etc., and others.

W. S. McKenzie, Taylor, Porter, Brooks & Phillips, Baton Rouge, La., for intervenor-appellant.

Kenneth C. Scullin, Boris Navratil and Maurice J. Wilson, of Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, Baton Rouge, La., for McDonnell & Miller, Inc.

Appeals from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; E. Gordon West, Chief Judge.

Before BELL, AINSWORTH and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1 Boeing Company v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir. 1969).

1

See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5th Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
440 F.2d 793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarence-vincent-v-royal-globe-insurance-company-mrs-hilda-mae-smith-ca5-1971.