Clarence Tate, Jr. v. Olin G. Blackwell, Warden
This text of 475 F.2d 193 (Clarence Tate, Jr. v. Olin G. Blackwell, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Clarence Tate, Jr., an inmate of the United States Penitentiary in Atlanta, Georgia, initiated the present action under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 et seq., against his warden and others for damages resulting from personal injuries allegedly incurred while engaged in assigned duties at the prison. Tate contended that Warden Blackwell and other prison officials conspired to make him fall off a ladder in order to deprive him of his constitutional rights. The district court granted defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. We affirm.
It is evident from the complaint the plaintiff relies solely upon the negligence of the prison authorities and there *194 is no connection between the defendants’ alleged negligence and the deprivation of any of the plaintiff’s constitutional rights. Our decision is without prejudice to the plaintiff’s right to pursue a possible remedy under 18 U.S.C. § 4126, which provides compensation for federal prisoners injured in the performance of assigned work duties at a federal penitentiary.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
475 F.2d 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarence-tate-jr-v-olin-g-blackwell-warden-ca5-1973.