Clarence Tate, Jr. v. Olin G. Blackwell

454 F.2d 739, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11621
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 26, 1972·No. 71-3037·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. 1 See Local Rule 21. 2

1

. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s local Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.

2

. See N.L.R.B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clarence Tate, Jr. v. Olin G. Blackwell, 454 F.2d 739, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11621 (5th Cir. 1972).

454 F.2d 739 (Clarence Tate, Jr. v. Olin G. Blackwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related