Clarence Johnson, Relator v. University Good Samaritan, and Sentry Insurance Group
This text of Clarence Johnson, Relator v. University Good Samaritan, and Sentry Insurance Group (Clarence Johnson, Relator v. University Good Samaritan, and Sentry Insurance Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF MINNESOTA November 17, 2015
IN SUPREME COURT Dm~E OF' APPB.LA1ECcuns A15-0212
Clarence Johnson,
Relator,
vs.
University Good Samaritan,
Respondent, and
Sentry Insurance Group,
Respondent.
Clarence Johnson, Richfield, Minnesota, prose.
Kirk C. Thompson, Cronan Thompson, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents.
Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation
Court of Appeals filed January 22, 2015, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion.
Dated: November 17, 2015 BY THE COURT:
Lorie S. Gildea Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Clarence Johnson, Relator v. University Good Samaritan, and Sentry Insurance Group, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarence-johnson-relator-v-university-good-samaritan-and-sentry-minn-2015.