Clarence Johnson, Relator v. University Good Samaritan, and Sentry Insurance Group

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided November 25, 2015·No. A15-212·Published

Opinion

STATE OF MINNESOTA

November 17, 2015

IN SUPREME COURT Dm~E OF'

APPB.LA1ECcuns

A15-0212

Clarence Johnson, Relator,

vs. University Good Samaritan,

Respondent,

and

Sentry Insurance Group, Respondent.

Clarence Johnson, Richfield, Minnesota, prose. Kirk C. Thompson, Cronan Thompson, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed January 22, 2015, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion.

Dated: November 17, 2015 BY THE COURT:

Lorie S. Gildea

Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clarence Johnson, Relator v. University Good Samaritan, and Sentry Insurance Group, (Mich. 2015).

Clarence Johnson, Relator v. University Good Samaritan, and Sentry Insurance Group (Clarence Johnson, Relator v. University Good Samaritan, and Sentry Insurance Group) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.