Clarence H. Hand v. International Chemical Workers Union, International Chemical Workers Union Local No. 328, and Arizona Chemical Company

692 F.2d 714, 112 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2517, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24261
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clarence H. Hand v. International Chemical Workers Union, International Chemical Workers Union Local No. 328, and Arizona Chemical Company. Read the opinion of the Court — 681 F.2d 1308
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided November 8, 1982·No. 81-5828·Published

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion August 2, 1982, 11 Cir., 1982, 681 F.2d 1308.)

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clarence H. Hand v. International Chemical Workers Union, International Chemical Workers Union Local No. 328, and Arizona Chemical Company, 692 F.2d 714, 112 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2517, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24261 (11th Cir. 1982).

692 F.2d 714 (Clarence H. Hand v. International Chemical Workers Union, International Chemical Workers Union Local No. 328, and Arizona Chemical Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related