Clarence Garcia v. Michael A. Hillsberry

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 5, 2012·No. 02-12-00211-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00211-CV

CLARENCE GARCIA APPELLANT

V.

MICHAEL A. HILLSBERRY APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 362ND DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

We have considered “Appellant's Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”

It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss

the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. DELIVERED: July 5, 2012

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clarence Garcia v. Michael A. Hillsberry, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Clarence Garcia v. Michael A. Hillsberry (Clarence Garcia v. Michael A. Hillsberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.