Clarence Farmer v. United States

341 F.2d 411, 119 U.S. App. D.C. 278
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided December 31, 1964·No. 18791_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of housebreaking and petit larceny. His counsel, appointed by this court, urges two grounds for reversal, (1) that two oral confessions made by appellant were involuntary, 1 and (2) the confessions were not corroborated. Upon consideration of the testimony as to the circumstances in which the confessions were made, and the evidence bearing on the issue of corroboration, we can accept neither ground as a basis for reversal.

Affirmed.

1

. One of the confessions was made to an officer in a telephone conversation prior to arrest. The other was made to the same officer at about the time of arrest of appellant at the apartment of a friend. Mallory v. United States, 354 U.S. 449, 77 S.Ct. 1356, 1 L.Ed.2d 1479 (1957), accordingly has no application

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clarence Farmer v. United States, 341 F.2d 411, 119 U.S. App. D.C. 278 (D.C. Cir. 1964).

341 F.2d 411 (Clarence Farmer v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mallory v. United States
354 U.S. 449 (Supreme Court, 1957)