Clarence E. Baxter v. Lancer Industries, Inc.

324 F.2d 286, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 3769
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedNovember 8, 1963
Docket28425
StatusPublished

This text of 324 F.2d 286 (Clarence E. Baxter v. Lancer Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clarence E. Baxter v. Lancer Industries, Inc., 324 F.2d 286, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 3769 (2d Cir. 1963).

Opinion

324 F.2d 286

Clarence E. BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LANCER INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 161.

Docket 28425.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued November 8, 1963.

Decided November 8, 1963.

Grossman & Grossman, New York City (Louis Grossman, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Levy & Nevins, New York City (Saul S. Nevins, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.

Before WATERMAN, MOORE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant's complaint seeks recovery upon three separate causes of action, and he seeks review of an order entered in United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York denying his motion for summary judgment for the full amount of damages claimed in his first cause of action, or, in the alternative, for partial summary judgment thereon for a lesser amount.

In open court on our own motion we dismiss the appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baxter v. Lancer Industries, Inc.
324 F.2d 286 (Second Circuit, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
324 F.2d 286, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 3769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarence-e-baxter-v-lancer-industries-inc-ca2-1963.