Clarence E. Baxter v. Lancer Industries, Inc.
This text of 324 F.2d 286 (Clarence E. Baxter v. Lancer Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Clarence E. BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LANCER INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 161.
Docket 28425.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued November 8, 1963.
Decided November 8, 1963.
Grossman & Grossman, New York City (Louis Grossman, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.
Levy & Nevins, New York City (Saul S. Nevins, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.
Before WATERMAN, MOORE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant's complaint seeks recovery upon three separate causes of action, and he seeks review of an order entered in United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York denying his motion for summary judgment for the full amount of damages claimed in his first cause of action, or, in the alternative, for partial summary judgment thereon for a lesser amount.
In open court on our own motion we dismiss the appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
324 F.2d 286, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 3769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarence-e-baxter-v-lancer-industries-inc-ca2-1963.