Clarence David McNeil v. Shirley Burch, Sbi Agent P.R. Kelly, Sbi Agent North Carolina State Bureau of Investigations Raleigh City Police Department

862 F.2d 870, 1988 WL 124960
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 17, 1988
Docket88-7185
StatusUnpublished

This text of 862 F.2d 870 (Clarence David McNeil v. Shirley Burch, Sbi Agent P.R. Kelly, Sbi Agent North Carolina State Bureau of Investigations Raleigh City Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clarence David McNeil v. Shirley Burch, Sbi Agent P.R. Kelly, Sbi Agent North Carolina State Bureau of Investigations Raleigh City Police Department, 862 F.2d 870, 1988 WL 124960 (4th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

862 F.2d 870
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Clarence David McNEIL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Shirley BURCH, SBI Agent; P.R. Kelly, SBI Agent; North
Carolina State Bureau of Investigations; Raleigh
City Police Department, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-7185.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 24, 1988.
Decided: Nov. 17, 1988.

Clarence David McNeil, appellant pro se.

William Norris Farrell, Jr. (Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina), Tyrus Vance Dahl, Jr. (Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice), for appellees.

Before ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Clarence David McNeil appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McNeil v. Burch, C/A No. 87-416-CRT (E.D.N.C. June 22, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
862 F.2d 870, 1988 WL 124960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarence-david-mcneil-v-shirley-burch-sbi-agent-pr-kelly-sbi-agent-ca4-1988.