Clarence Copeland v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Clarence Copeland v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 3, 2017

Docket17-0639

StatusPublished

This text of Clarence Copeland v. State of Florida (Clarence Copeland v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clarence Copeland v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

CLARENCE COPELAND, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D17-0639

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed April 4, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Clarence Copeland, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied as premature.

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI