Clarence Collins v. Larry Norris, Commissioner of Corrections

92 F.3d 1189, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27982, 1996 WL 396594
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJuly 17, 1996
Docket95-2985
StatusUnpublished

This text of 92 F.3d 1189 (Clarence Collins v. Larry Norris, Commissioner of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clarence Collins v. Larry Norris, Commissioner of Corrections, 92 F.3d 1189, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27982, 1996 WL 396594 (8th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

92 F.3d 1189

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
Clarence COLLINS, Appellant,
v.
Larry NORRIS, Commissioner of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 95-2985.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted July 5, 1996.
Filed July 17, 1996.

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Clarence Collins, an Arkansas prisoner, was convicted of burglary and sentenced as an habitual offender to forty years imprisonment. The Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed his conviction and sentence. Collins v. State, 826 S.W.2d 231, 232 (Ark.1992). After pursuing state post-conviction remedies, Collins filed this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief. The district court1 denied the petition without an evidentiary hearing, and Collins appeals.

After careful review of the record before us and the parties' briefs (including Collins's pro se supplemental brief), we conclude the district court correctly denied Collins's petition. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Collins's motion for appointment of new counsel, as Collins was able to assert in his pro se supplemental brief the arguments he complained his counsel omitted.

1

The Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Collins v. State
826 S.W.2d 231 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 F.3d 1189, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27982, 1996 WL 396594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarence-collins-v-larry-norris-commissioner-of-corrections-ca8-1996.