Clarence C. Christman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Sixth Circuit

Clarence C. Christman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

381 F.2d 381, 20 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5355

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJuly 31, 1967

Docket17037

StatusPublished

This text of 381 F.2d 381 (Clarence C. Christman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clarence C. Christman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 381 F.2d 381, 20 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5355 (6th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER.

This cause having come on to be heard upon the appeal of Clarence C. Christman from orders of the United States Tax Court denying the following motions filed by Christman: Motion for New Trial; Motion for Reconsideration; Motion to Reconsider Petitioner’s Request for Continuance ; Motion for Assignment of Case to Trial and for Opportunity to Present Newly Discovered Evidence; and Motion to Set Aside or to Allow Petitioner to Withdraw Purported Stipulations, and the Court having considered the record on appeal and the briefs and arguments of counsel, upon due consideration thereof,

It is ordered that the orders and judgment of the Tax Court be, and they are, hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER.

This cause having come on to be heard upon the appeal of Clarence C. Christman from orders of the United States Tax Court denying the following motions filed by Christman: Motion for New Trial; Motion for Reconsideration; Motion to Reconsider Petitioner’s Request for Continuance ; Motion for Assignment of Case to Trial and for Opportunity to Present Newly Discovered Evidence; and Motion to Set Aside or to Allow Petitioner to Withdraw Purported Stipulations, and the Court having considered the record on appeal and the briefs and arguments of counsel, upon due consideration thereof,

It is ordered that the orders and judgment of the Tax Court be, and they are, hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

381 F.2d 381, 20 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarence-c-christman-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca6-1967.