Clarence B. Dandridge v. United States
247 F.2d 105
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided November 12, 1957·No. 13813_1·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Appellant urges that the District Court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw a plea of guilty to a charge of assault with a deadly weapon contemporaneous with dismissal of a charge of carrying a dangerous weapon.
A hearing was conducted in which the District Judge questioned appellant and his counsel on the circumstances surrounding the making of a plea of guilty before he denied the motion. We find no abuse of discretion.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clarence B. Dandridge v. United States, 247 F.2d 105 (D.C. Cir. 1957).
247 F.2d 105 (Clarence B. Dandridge v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sullivan v. United States
205 F. Supp. 545 (S.D. New York, 1962)
Clarence B. Dandridge v. United States
265 F.2d 349 (D.C. Circuit, 1959)
William L. Poole v. United States
250 F.2d 396 (D.C. Circuit, 1957)