Clarence B. Dandridge v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Clarence B. Dandridge v. United States

247 F.2d 105

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedNovember 12, 1957

Docket13813_1

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 247 F.2d 105 (Clarence B. Dandridge v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clarence B. Dandridge v. United States, 247 F.2d 105 (D.C. Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant urges that the District Court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw a plea of guilty to a charge of assault with a deadly weapon contemporaneous with dismissal of a charge of carrying a dangerous weapon.

A hearing was conducted in which the District Judge questioned appellant and his counsel on the circumstances surrounding the making of a plea of guilty before he denied the motion. We find no abuse of discretion.

Affirmed.

EDGERTON, Chief Judge, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI