Clarence Andrews, Jr. v. Ditech Mortgage Corp.
This text of 689 F. App'x 746 (Clarence Andrews, Jr. v. Ditech Mortgage Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Clarence Andrews, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for failure to comply with the court’s order directing him to amend his complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s *747 brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Andrews’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Andrews has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
689 F. App'x 746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarence-andrews-jr-v-ditech-mortgage-corp-ca4-2017.