Clare v. New York Safety Reserve Fund Life Insurance

95 N.Y.S. 1118

This text of 95 N.Y.S. 1118 (Clare v. New York Safety Reserve Fund Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clare v. New York Safety Reserve Fund Life Insurance, 95 N.Y.S. 1118 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide event, upon questions of law only; the facts having been examined and no error found therein. Held, that the answer^ of “No occasion” to the question in the application constituted a breach of warranty which bars a recovery.

WILLIAMS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 N.Y.S. 1118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clare-v-new-york-safety-reserve-fund-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1905.