Clare v. National City Bank

5 F. Cas. 831, 14 Blatchf. 445, 1878 U.S. App. LEXIS 1645
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedMay 2, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 5 F. Cas. 831 (Clare v. National City Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clare v. National City Bank, 5 F. Cas. 831, 14 Blatchf. 445, 1878 U.S. App. LEXIS 1645 (circtsdny 1878).

Opinion

CHOATE, District Judge.

This is an appeal from the clerk’s taxation of costs. The suit is an action at law originally brought in a state court. After three trials in the state court, in two of which the plaintiff had a verdict, which, upon appeal, was set aside, and the judgment reversed, with costs to the defendant, to abide the event, the cause was removed into this court by the plaintiff, and the defendant now has a verdict and a judgment. The clerk, in taxing the costs, has disallowed the fees taxable by the New York Code, to the defendant's attorney, as fees for proceedings before and after the granting of a new trial, term fees, trial fees, argument fees, fees for making and serving a case, &e., which, if the case had proceeded to the same result in the state court, would have been taxable against the plaintiff, for the proceedings prior to the removal of the cause, amounting, in all, to $435. From the dis-allowance of these items the defendant appeals.

The clerk is right in his taxation. In this court, the amount of costs to be allowed to attorneys is governed by sections 823 and [832]*832824 of the Revised Statutes, which do not give to the attorney any of the fees now in question. In general, there is no vested right to costs till judgment, and they are only recoverable as taxable by the law in force at the time of taxation. The acts authorizing the removal of causes to this court provide that the cause removed shall proceed in the same manner as if originally commenced here, and there is nothing in those acts which lends support to the defendant’s claim for these costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vernon Lumber Corp. v. Harcen Const. Co.
61 F. Supp. 939 (E.D. New York, 1945)
Williams v. Sawyer Bros.
51 F.2d 1004 (Second Circuit, 1931)
Sawyer v. Williams
72 F. 296 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland, 1896)
Trinidad Asphalt Paving Co. v. Robinson
52 F. 347 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan, 1892)
Cleaver v. Traders' Ins. Co.
40 F. 863 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan, 1889)
Henning v. Western Union Tel. Co.
40 F. 658 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina, 1889)
Chadbourne v. German-American Ins.
31 F. 625 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1887)
Coy v. Perkins
13 F. 111 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 F. Cas. 831, 14 Blatchf. 445, 1878 U.S. App. LEXIS 1645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clare-v-national-city-bank-circtsdny-1878.