Clardy v. State

89 S.W.2d 785, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 733
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 15, 1936
DocketNo. 17840
StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.W.2d 785 (Clardy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clardy v. State, 89 S.W.2d 785, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 733 (Tex. 1936).

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for possessing, for the purpose of sale, intoxicating liquor containing more than 3.2 per cent, alcohol by volume; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

After the conviction of this appellant, the law making it a felony to manufacture, possess, sell, etc., any kind of intoxicating liquor in this state was repealed, and no saving clause appears in the repealing statute taking care of pending prosecutions. This fact necessitates the reversal and dismissal of this case, and it is ordered that the judgment of the trial court be reversed and the prosecution dismissed following Meadows v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 88 S.W.(2d) 481, opinion handed down November 27, 1935.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meadows v. State
88 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 S.W.2d 785, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clardy-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.